CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grilling

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

74

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is grilling in mattpocock/skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model instruction-only skill: a compact, novel interviewing procedure conveyed entirely through concrete rules, a copy-paste output template, and explicit checkpoints (wait for answers, recompute frontier, terminal confirmation gate). No redundancy, no missing structure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every token earns its place: the ~25-line body introduces only novel machinery (design tree, frontier, rounds, sub-agent fact-finding) with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: a literal round template with numbered questions and recommended answers, an explicit 'dispatch a sub-agent, never ask the user for facts' rule, and a precise termination condition ('frontier is empty').

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit (map tree → compute frontier → ask round → wait → recompute → repeat) with a built-in feedback loop ('Each round the user answers reshapes the tree') and a final gate ('Do not act on it until the user confirms').

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized with bolded key concepts and a formatted template — squarely meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with explicit what-and-when structure and a distinctive, natural trigger ('stress-test their thinking', 'grill'). Its main weakness is thin capability coverage — a single verb ('grill') rather than the multiple concrete actions top-scored examples list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('a plan, decision, or idea') and one concrete action ('Grill the user relentlessly') but does not enumerate multiple specific capabilities, matching the '1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea') and when ('Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any \'grill\' trigger phrases') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'stress-test their thinking' and 'grill' are natural user phrases with good coverage, but common synonyms (interrogate, poke holes, devil's advocate, challenge my plan) are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Grill' is a distinctive niche verb with clear dedicated triggers; only trivial overlap risk with general plan-review skills, matching the 'clear niche, minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
koenighotze/wheel-of-meeting
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.