Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction-only skill that teaches a novel vocabulary (loop, trigger, checkpoint, push right, brief) with genuine token efficiency and a strong definition-of-done checkpoint. Its main weakness is executability detail: without a spec template or example, and without a sequenced description of a grilling round, the agent must improvise the skill's central artifact and process.
Suggestions
Add a minimal example workflow spec (5-10 lines in workflows/*.md format) so the skill's sole output artifact has a concrete shape to follow.
Sequence one explicit grilling round — e.g. open by proposing candidate loops from NOTES.md, ask a round of questions with a recommended answer each, then update the spec before the next round.
State how and when NOTES.md terms get sharpened into canonical vocabulary during a session (not just that they are recorded), closing the loop between the two files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: definitions like "Push right: defer the checkpoint as far as it will go. Do maximal work before involving the human" carry operational weight in every token, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Fits the anchor 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place' rather than 4, since there is no trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete behavioral guidance exists ("relentless, a round of questions at a time, a recommended answer attached to each"; specs live in `workflows/*.md`), but a key detail is missing: no example or template of what a workflow spec actually contains, so an agent must invent the spec format. Fits anchor 3 ('Some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'); below 4 because the missing spec format is more than a minor gap for a skill whose sole output is specs. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The grilling process is characterized and the definition of done ("an implementer agent could build it without asking a single question") is an explicit stopping checkpoint, but the session itself has no sequenced steps — how to open, iterate, or close a round, or when to consult NOTES.md mid-session. Fits anchor 3 ('Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit') rather than 4 because the session flow must be inferred. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external reference files, and is organized into four well-signaled sections (The loop lens, Vocabulary, Definition of done, The workspace), qualifying for 5 under the simple-skill exception in the scoring notes. The referenced paths (`workflows/*.md`, `NOTES.md`) are runtime workspace files, not buried bundle references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |