Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, information-dense skill body: concrete rules, executable examples, a clear workflow, and a verification checklist. The weakest points are the missing check.ts reference implementation, some redundant re-explanations of the recursion hazard, and the absence of an explicit verify-fix-retry loop.
Suggestions
Add a minimal scripts/check.ts skeleton (parallel spawn of fmt/lint/type-check/test with buffered output and import.meta.main guard) so the primary deliverable is copy-paste ready instead of assembled from 14 rules.
Explain the fork-bomb/recursion hazard once (rule 13) and have rule 14 and the test.ts example comment reference it rather than restate the mechanics.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow, e.g. "If deno task check fails: fix the failing item, then re-run until it passes cleanly" — the retry step is currently only implicit in the final checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The rules are dense, imperative, and contain no concept re-teaching, but there are minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed: the fork-bomb hazard is explained three times (rule 13, rule 14, and the code-example comment), and incident dates ("2026-09-06", "2026-05-09: ... WindowServer kernel panics") add tokens without changing behavior. Not 3: nearly every rule is substantive, non-obvious project-specific knowledge that earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready deno.json tasks block and a complete executable scripts/test.ts example with exact commands. Not 5: the primary deliverable, scripts/check.ts, has no skeleton or example — its required behavior must be assembled from 14 separate rules, which is a minor gap for the most important artifact. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow has a clear 4-step sequence (Analyze, Scaffold Scripts, Configure Tasks, Verify) plus a final verification checklist, and the scaffold step cross-references the rules. Not 5: there is no explicit feedback loop for error recovery — e.g., "if deno task check fails, fix the reported item and re-run" — leaving the retry checkpoint implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed: the skill is self-contained and appropriately inline for a single configuration task, with well-organized sections (Context, Standard Interface, Rules & Constraints, Workflow, Examples, Verification) that make navigation easy. Nothing here belongs in a separate reference file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |