review
Use when the user asks to review CURRENT uncommitted changes (staged, unstaged, branch diff) before committing, or to synthesize JiT tests against the diff — QA + lead-engineer verdict on quality, architecture, cleanup. Needs a diff, not old commits.
61
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./plugins/flowai/skills/review/SKILL.mdW011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The review workflow inspects local git diffs, working tree changes, commit messages, and optionally executes `gh pr view` to fetch a PR body, which can contain outsider-authored text if reviewing an external PR.
- Repository
korchasa/flowai-plugins
- Revision
240d92b
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.