Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, well-structured instruction-only skill that teaches the GODS format through guiding questions and four concrete worked examples. It is efficient and actionable but carries minor padding in the intro and lacks an explicit fill-in template or sequencing instruction.
Suggestions
Trim the four promotional intro bullets ('Helps to clearly articulate...', 'Makes the task transparent...', etc.) to one line, since the structure and examples already demonstrate the value.
Add an explicit blank template (e.g., a '## Template' block with 'G — Goal: ...', 'O — Overview: ...', 'D — Definition of Done: ...', 'S — Solution: ...') users can copy and fill in directly.
Add a one-line sequencing note instructing Claude to elicit or infer each of the four sections in order, including how to proceed when a section's information is missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core structure (G/O/D/S with guiding questions) and examples are lean and assume competence, but the introductory bullets ('Helps to clearly articulate...', 'Makes the task transparent...', 'Does not replace flexible processes...') are mildly promotional padding that could be trimmed; fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides guiding questions per section and four concrete worked examples that serve as copyable templates, giving mostly executable guidance for an instruction-only skill; not a 5 because it lacks an explicit fill-in template or schema for the user to populate directly. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The G→O→D→S ordering is a clear, simple single-purpose sequence reinforced by consistent examples, but the body never explicitly instructs 'produce these four sections in order' or how to handle a task that lacks information for a section; minor sequencing gaps keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers ('What is GODS?', 'EXAMPLES OF APPLYING GODS', numbered sub-examples) and no external references needed, but at ~78 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-lines simple-skill threshold and inlines four full examples that could be split out; good structure with minor organization gaps rather than the ideal 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |