Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
For a deprecation stub, the body is exemplary: it states the move, links the exact new location, gives an executable install command, and explicitly warns that no component rules live here. It is maximally concise, fully actionable, and cleanly organized. The mild wrinkle is the phrase "Ask the agent to use component-builder", which reads as addressed to a human user even though the skill executes inside the agent — cosmetic, not workflow ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Seven lean lines: a one-sentence redirect with the new location, a copy-paste install command, and one closing clarification ("This compatibility entry contains no component rules and is no longer maintained") that prevents wasted searching. No padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. Not a 4: there is no over-explanation to trim; even the "component layer for AI agents" descriptor is a single necessary contextual phrase. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command (`npx skills add kostja94/bricks --skill component-builder`), a direct link to the carousel component reference that now holds the rules, and an unambiguous instruction for the one common case this skill exists for (build a new Carousel). Not a 4: there is no gap — the redirect action is complete and specific, which is all a compatibility entry should do. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines: the single action (install and use component-builder instead) is stated twice and is unambiguous, so per the simple-skill scoring note workflow clarity can score 5. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation checkpoints are required. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and none are needed; the only pointer is the clearly signaled, one-level-deep link to the carousel reference in Bricks. The body is well organized (title, location, command, closing note) — matching the guideline that skills under 50 lines with no need for external references can score 5 with well-organized sections. Not a 4: there is no content that should be split out and no buried or multi-level reference chain. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |