Conciseness

The body is a lean 8-line redirect: a heading, a one-sentence pointer to the successor, an install command, and one instruction. Every token earns its place with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not below 5 because nothing could be cut without losing information.

Actionability

The install command 'npx skills add kostja94/bricks --skill component-builder' is copy-paste ready and the follow-up instruction ('Ask the agent to use component-builder to build a new How-to Section') is concrete and complete for the entry's purpose. Not below 5 because no key detail is missing for executing the migration.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill whose single action (install the successor, then use it) is unambiguous and correctly ordered, so the simple-skill exception applies. Not below 5 because no destructive or batch operation is involved, so no validation checkpoint is required.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and consists of a well-organized single section that links one level deep to the successor's reference document. Per the scoring notes, this satisfies the top anchor for short self-contained skills; there are no buried or nested references.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('How-to Section construction') and one concrete action ('install and use component-builder'), matching the anchor for naming the domain with 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive. It is not score 4 because it lists no capabilities of the component itself, and not score 2 because 'install and use component-builder to build a new How-to Section' is more concrete than a generic domain mention.

Completeness

There is a clear 'what' — a deprecated compatibility entry whose successor is component-builder — but no 'when' guidance at all, so the missing-'Use when' clause caps this at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not score 2 because the 'what' is explicit and specific rather than vague; not score 4 because no trigger context is present or implied.

Trigger Term Quality

'How-to Section' and 'component-builder' are relevant domain keywords, but the description offers no natural trigger phrases or synonyms a user would say, matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. Not score 4 because there is no coverage of natural variations users might use (e.g., tutorial section, guide section); not score 2 because the keywords present are specific rather than generic.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The scope is narrowly pinned to 'How-to Section construction' with a named successor, so it is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general component-building skills. Not score 5 because 'compatibility entry' language and the reference to generic 'Bricks' leave slight ambiguity against sibling component entries; not score 3 because the domain term is far more specific than the 'Works with document files' anchor.