Conciseness

Mostly efficient (tight tables, no tutoring on what Product Hunt is), but it could be tightened: the tagline ≤60 chars, gallery 1270×760, demo video <2 min, first comment, and 3–5 topic tags specs each appear twice — once in the 30-day plan's Assets row and again in the Product Hunt Fields table. This matches the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than 4, where only minor trimming would be needed.

Actionability

Highly concrete, executable specs throughout: "≤60 chars", "1270×760", "200+", "12:01am Pacific", "Tuesday–Thursday", "16+ hours", "3–5 relevant" tags. As an instruction-only skill no code is required, but it stops short of fully copy-ready output — no sample tagline or first-comment template — matching 'concrete guidance with minor gaps' rather than 5.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced multi-phase workflow (Initial Assessment → 30-day plan with day ranges → launch-day practices → post-launch) with a readiness assessment up front. Not 5 because validation checkpoints are implicit (no explicit 'verify all assets ready the day before' gate), and the Assets row's "build awareness on X/LinkedIn 2–4 weeks before" conflicts with its own 10–3-days phase, creating a sequencing ambiguity.

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill with no bundle directories; content is well-sectioned (assessment, plan, fields, launch day, expectations, post-launch, output format) and everything present is core guidance that reasonably stays inline. It misses 5 only because the over-50-line exception for reference-free skills doesn't apply at ~90 lines, and the Related Skills section lists five sibling skills without signals for which content lives where.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — "launch on Product Hunt, prepare a PH submission, or plan launch day (hunter, first comment, timing, upvotes)" — matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. It falls short of 5 because post-launch follow-up and expectations management (covered in the body) are absent, and it doesn't reach the vagueness of 3 since multiple distinct actions with sub-tasks are named.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ("launch on Product Hunt, prepare a PH submission, or plan launch day") and when ("Also use when the user mentions..." with a list of concrete trigger phrases). This mirrors the 5-anchor example structure exactly; the 4-anchor's weakness (implicit or less specific 'when') does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage: "Product Hunt," "launch on Product Hunt," "PH launch," "Product Hunt submission," "hunter," "Product of the Day," "upvotes," "Product Hunt first comment" — including the abbreviation PH and outcome phrases users would naturally say. Matches the comprehensive synonym-coverage anchor; no common variation is missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with distinct triggers (Product Hunt specifically) and explicit boundary guidance redirecting overlapping cases: "For multi-platform directory listings and paste-ready copy beyond PH, use directory-submission." Minimal conflict risk, matching the 5 anchor.