Conciseness

The body is roughly 80 words with zero padding: a heading, one link sentence, one executable command, and one closing instruction. The only contextual clause ('the component layer for AI agents') identifies an external dependency Claude would not know, so every token earns its place. Matches anchor 5; not 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready executable command ('npx skills add kostja94/bricks --skill component-builder'), a direct link to the successor reference, and an unambiguous instruction ('Ask the agent to use component-builder to build a new Top Banner') that fully covers this skill's single purpose. Matches anchor 5; not 4 because there are no gaps for the redirect use case.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill and its one action — redirect to the successor — is completely unambiguous, satisfying the simple-skill exception. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so the validation cap does not apply. Not 4 because nothing is ambiguous or missing for the single-step flow.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no bundle files (none exist), and the body is well organized with a clear heading, an executable install command, and a clearly signaled one-level-deep external reference. Satisfies the under-50-line exception for a top score; not 4 because there are no organization gaps or buried references.

Specificity

Names the domain ('Top Banner construction') and two concrete actions ('install and use component-builder to build a new Top Banner'), but coverage is not comprehensive. It matches anchor 3 rather than 4 because only two actions are listed, and not 2 because the actions are concrete rather than generic.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (a deprecated compatibility entry whose successor is component-builder), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not 2 because the 'what' is specific, not vague; not 4 because 'when' is at best weakly implied.

Trigger Term Quality

'Top Banner' is a relevant natural keyword, but common variations and synonyms users would actually say (e.g., 'banner', 'header', 'hero section', 'announcement bar') are absent. This fits anchor 3 — some relevant keywords but missing variations — rather than 4, since keyword coverage rests on a single niche term.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Top Banner construction' is a concrete niche, so the skill is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against closely related banner/header skills. Not 5 because the description lacks explicit distinct trigger phrases; not 3 because it is far more specific than a generic 'works with document files' style description.