Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally lean and highly actionable, with concrete tool names, parameter structures, and explicit validation/feedback loops for async runs and revision conflicts. Its only weakness is organization: a flat bullet list rather than grouped sections or an explicit numbered workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bullet list with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every bullet states a concrete rule with tool names and parameter shapes, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact tool names (creator_get_context, creator_apply_action, creator_wait_for_stage) and copy-paste-ready input structures (input: { patch: {...}, objectId? }, input: { stageId: "..." }) with named fields (expectedRevision, idempotencyKey, commandReceipt.stageRunId) cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (get context → apply action with revision/idempotency → wait for terminal state) with explicit validation checkpoints (re-read context on param error and retry; retry once on revision conflict then escalate to user; only conclude after a terminal state). Not a 5 because the steps are scattered across a flat bullet list rather than presented as a single explicit numbered sequence with a checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external bundle files (none exist), so it qualifies for the simple-skill exception; content is appropriately self-contained. Not a 5 because it is a flat bullet list under a single heading with no section grouping (e.g., context / actions / async / safety), a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |