Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable workflow document with excellent sequencing and safety validation for a money-adjacent operation. Its main weakness is that the progressive-disclosure layer is broken in practice: every referenced detail file cited in the read order is absent from the bundle, leaving the copy-phase JSON format and API details unreachable.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (prompting/copy-guide.md, reference/deploy-patterns.md, reference/meta-api-cheatsheet.md) or fix the paths so the read-order links resolve — currently all three are missing from the bundle.
Include a minimal inline example of the copy.json shape (one body, one title, one description with required keys) so Phase 2 is executable even without copy-guide.md.
Clarify the directory layout: the body uses both 'prompting/' and 'reference/' while bundle conventions here use 'references/' — standardize so referenced paths are predictable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no concept explanations, just terse sections like "Run `bash scripts/check-meta-env.sh` to verify credentials before anything else". The PAUSED rule appearing in Workflow, Safety rules, and Cost note is deliberate emphasis on a money-adjacent risk rather than padding, so it fits the 5 anchor over the 4 ('could be trimmed') anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Deploy and research commands are fully concrete and copy-paste ready (e.g. the complete `deploy-ad.py --dry-run` and `pull-top-ads.py --date-preset last_30d --min-spend 100 --limit 15` invocations), but Phase 2 defers the essential `--copy-file` JSON shape to `prompting/copy-guide.md`, which is not present in the bundle — a real executable gap that keeps this below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases are clearly sequenced (env check → optional research → copy → deploy) with a decision tree mapping user intents to phases, and the money-adjacent deploy has explicit validation: "Always dry-run first... Review the payload with the user, then deploy for real", plus error-handling notes (video polling, OAuthException retry) — matching the 5 anchor with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The structure itself is well-signaled (an explicit read order with "Consult as needed; don't read end-to-end", one level deep), but all three referenced files — `prompting/copy-guide.md`, `reference/deploy-patterns.md`, `reference/meta-api-cheatsheet.md` — are missing from the bundle, so navigation breaks and critical content is unreachable. That is more than the 'minor organization gaps' of the 4 anchor, fitting the 3 anchor for incomplete reference organization. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |