Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent instruction-only skill: lean, fully actionable house-style rules with executable validation checks and a well-sequenced workflow that includes an explicit validation gate. The only structural observation is that everything lives inline in SKILL.md with no reference files, which is defensible for a style manual but leaves minor organization headroom.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, project-specific house-style manual: rendering rules ("The app splits a guide into sections in `TextUtils.getSections`"), a wording table, banned words, and reusable templates, with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every token carries a rule Claude could not derive on its own, matching the lean score-5 anchor rather than the minor-trimming score-4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: copy-paste procedure and reusable-section templates, exact verification commands (grep/xxd checks that "complete when none of them print anything"), and a precise wording table ("`Tap the **+** button in the bottom-right corner.`"). This matches the score-5 anchor of copy-paste-ready commands covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section gives a clear six-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("This step is complete when none of them print anything") plus a follow-up reading confirmation of lead-ins, numbering, and cross-references. The completion criterion defines a validate-fix-retry loop, matching the score-5 anchor; it exceeds score 4 because validation is explicit and specific rather than a vague "verify output". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so all content is inline in a clearly sectioned 149-line body with descriptive headings that make navigation easy. It sits at score 4 rather than 5 because there are no well-signaled one-level-deep references — the wording table and reusable-section templates are reference-style material that could be split into a separate file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |