Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strongly executable, well-sequenced review workflow with copy-paste-ready git/gh commands, explicit safety guards around checkout, and a concrete report template. The only slack is minor verbosity and the absence of any external reference split for the repo-specific i18n and path conventions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and command-first with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries project-specific guidance. Minor over-length in spots (e.g. the long i18n bullet at the style section) that could be trimmed or split out. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: concrete commands ('gh pr view <pr>' with the exact field list, 'git diff upstream/main...HEAD', 'git show upstream/main:<path>'), specific project anchors ('parseApiInput', 'packages/global/openapi'), explicit i18n anti-patterns with code, and a complete markdown output template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (entry routing → info gathering → four review dimensions → deep-dive loop → output format) with real checkpoints: git status guard before checkout, user decision on uncommitted changes, old-behavior verification via 'git show', and the mandatory '调用链闭环'. Minor gap: no explicit re-verify/retry loop for the checkout step itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the skill is a single, well-sectioned file where all inline content is coherent review guidance. The detailed FastGPT i18n key rules and project-specific path conventions are inlined project knowledge that could arguably live in a reference file, keeping it just short of a fully clean split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |