Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, well-sequenced with safety checkpoints, and concisely written. It is a strong, self-contained review skill with little to improve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence with no padding about git/diff basics; only minor explanatory phrases like '需要用 reviewer 能快速理解的方式说明' could be trimmed, keeping it just below the 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact 'gh pr view' fields, 'git diff upstream/main...HEAD -- <path>', 'git show upstream/main:<path>', 'rg -n ...', plus a concrete markdown output template covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clearly sequenced (入口判断 → 信息收集 → 审查维度 → 深挖方法 → 输出格式) with explicit validation checkpoints ('切换 PR 前必须检查 git status --short') and a '调用链闭环' feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained single-file skill with no bundle files present; content is well-organized under clear section headers, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |