Content
48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a clear phased workflow and explicit wait-for-response checkpoints, but it is verbose (explaining prompt-engineering fundamentals Claude already knows) and lacks concrete copy-paste deliverable templates, with everything crammed into one file.
Suggestions
Trim the Knowledge Base section to only the technique-to-signal mapping; Claude already knows what CoT/ToT/ReAct are, so the definitions are wasted tokens.
Add at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready final-deliverable prompt template (with XML/Markdown structure) so the 'Phase 3: 最终交付' guidance is executable rather than described.
Move the Example Scenarios and Knowledge Base into separate reference files (e.g., references/techniques.md, references/examples.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure and cut the inlined bulk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~240-line body spends substantial tokens explaining concepts Claude already knows (definitions of CoT, Self-Consistency, ToT, ReAct, Few-shot, Zero-shot) and repeats guidance across 'Operating Principles', 'Quality Standards', and 'Important Reminders', making it noticeably verbose with several padded sections. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The three-phase workflow and example dialogues give some concrete, usable guidance (signal-to-technique mapping, deliverable checklist), but there is no copy-paste-ready prompt template or output schema and much of the guidance stays abstract ('激发用户的灵感', '永远追求优雅'), leaving key execution details implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 诊断 → 协作构建 → 最终交付 sequence is clearly phased and reinforced with explicit 'wait for user response' checkpoints (e.g., '重要：绝不直接动手修改，等待回应'), though the checkpoints are restated informally rather than crisply structured as a validate-proceed loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is clear section-level structure, but no bundle files exist and the large Knowledge Base of techniques plus multiple example scenarios are all inlined into a single ~240-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |