Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent instruction-and-navigation skill body: dense, actionable, and honest about its sources of truth. The CLI workflow is copy-paste ready and references are well-organized one level deep. The only gap is a missing explicit validation checkpoint before publishing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense tables and one-line rules throughout ("Read the matching doc page before writing code; do not guess SDK signatures"; "Request the minimum; high-risk operations are flagged to the confirming member") with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Not 4: there is no over-explanation to trim — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready command block (lbp init → lbp run → lbp build → lbp login && lbp publish, each with inline comments), concrete call signatures with real argument names (call_platform_api(bot_uuid, action, params)), an explicit return-shape contract ("{"ok": True, "result": ...}"), and a concrete catalog command (python plugins/scripts/check_catalog.py --write). Not 4: the executable guidance is complete rather than having minor gaps; SDK signatures are deliberately and appropriately delegated to canonical docs. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section is a clearly ordered sequence (scaffold → configure debug env → attach/debug → build → publish) with per-step comments, and API guidance includes error-recovery rules ("check `ok`. Treat `permission_denied` as expected"). Not 5: the publish path lacks an explicit validation checkpoint before upload (e.g., verify the built .lbpkg or test results before lbp publish), and debugging as a checkpoint is implicit rather than an explicit gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview; two one-level-deep references (references/sdk-pitfalls.md, references/testing.md — both verified as real files with substantive content) are clearly signaled in a References section describing what each contains. Not 4: navigation is unambiguous and content is appropriately split between overview and references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |