Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, actionable maintenance skill with concrete commands, a clear workflow, and a clean one-level reference split. The only gap is that the post-edit validation checkpoint points to AGENTS.md rather than spelling out an inline validate-fix-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, using terse classification rules and concrete commands with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `rg "<feature|error|case id>" skills`, `bin/lbs case list`, `bin/lbs index --check`) and concrete file-path classification covering the common change types, matching the fully-executable score-5 anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered workflow is present with a verification step ('Run the checks in AGENTS.md after edits') and an entropy-check command, but the validation checkpoint is referenced externally rather than given as an explicit inline validate-fix-retry loop, placing it just below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that defers the detailed periodic-audit procedure to the verified one-level-deep file references/curation-workflow.md with a clear closing pointer, matching the well-signaled score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |