Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready configuration and a clear usage sequence, and it stays lean with no over-explanation of known concepts. Its only weaknesses are a developer-oriented section that inflates token cost and minor validation/explicit-checkpoint gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and rule-carrying with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the "Implementation & maintenance (for Space developers)" section serves repo maintainers rather than the skill's agent audience and could be trimmed or relocated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact endpoint URLs, the Bearer PAT header, a copy-paste-ready client configuration JSON, concrete tool names, a complete search_plugins request body, and a browsable filter URL — all covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "How to use" gives a clear 4-step sequence (create PAT → configure client → search/get → select_models) with the 401 note and the empty-results guard acting as checkpoints, but explicit verify/retry steps are not spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with no bundle files, well organized under clear section headers; the inlined developer-maintenance section is a minor organization gap, and references like docs/MCP_SERVER.md are repo-internal pointers rather than one-level-deep skill references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |