Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under `api/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, frontend code, or backend code outside `api/`.
73
90%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Review the requested scope for concrete, reproducible defects. The nearest AGENTS.md owns package facts and commands; this skill owns the review workflow and routes to its bundled rule packs.
Read only the packs matched by the diff:
references/db-schema-rule.mdreferences/architecture-rule.mdreferences/repositories-rule.mdreferences/sqlalchemy-rule.mdWhen no pack applies, review correctness, security, behavior changes, and test evidence directly. Check current official documentation only when local code and contracts do not settle framework or library behavior.
Lead with findings ordered by severity. Include a tight file and line reference, the failing contract or reproduction path, impact, and a concrete fix direction. If there are no findings, say No issues found. and state any material verification gap. Do not add praise sections, speculative risks, or an unsolicited offer to implement fixes.
79effdd
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.