e2e-summary-skill

Summarize user input for Agent Builder E2E coverage.

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./e2e/fixtures/test-materials/e2e-summary-skill/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of lean, actionable instruction for a single-purpose skill: one clear task with an explicit required marker and no padding. It fully satisfies the simple-skill exceptions for workflow clarity and progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Two lean instruction lines with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Gives concrete, specific guidance (one concise paragraph) plus an exact required marker (E2E_SUMMARY_SKILL_PASS); for an instruction-only single-purpose skill this is fully actionable.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Single unambiguous action with no destructive or batch step; the simple-skill exception applies and the action is crystal clear.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no need for external references; the simple-skill exception allows a top score for a well-organized single-section skill.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and third-person with a clear 'what', but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and offers only a single concrete action. Adding trigger phrases and synonyms would lift specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should invoke this skill (e.g., 'Use when summarizing user input for Agent Builder E2E coverage tests').

Include natural trigger synonyms a user might say, such as 'summarize', 'summarize input', or 'E2E coverage summary', to improve trigger-term coverage.

Name an additional concrete action or output constraint in the description to increase capability specificity beyond a single verb.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('Summarize user input') with one concrete action in third person, but offers only a single action and no comprehensive coverage.	3 / 5
Completeness	States a clear 'what' (summarize user input) but provides no 'when' / 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some relevant keywords ('Summarize', 'user input') but leans on technical jargon ('Agent Builder E2E coverage') and misses common synonyms users would naturally say.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Agent Builder E2E coverage' qualifier gives it a niche, but 'Summarize user input' is broad enough to overlap with other summary skills.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: langgenius/dify
Path: e2e/fixtures/test-materials/e2e-summary-skill/SKILL.md
Commit: 79effdd

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.