Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A short, well-structured body with concrete CLI patterns, sensible schema-first discipline, and a clear single external reference, but it repeats its parameter rules three times and never shows a complete example invocation, leaving the executor to assemble flags from templates. It is solidly actionable with minor tightening needed.
Suggestions
Collapse the employee_type/user_ids rule into the table alone (drop the redundant 填充示例 and 注意 restatements, or merge them into one short example) to remove the triple repetition.
Add one complete worked example, e.g. lark-cli schema attendance.user_tasks.query followed by lark-cli attendance user_tasks query --data '{"user_ids": [], ...}', so the common case is copy-paste ready.
Add a brief note on interpreting the response (e.g. empty user_tasks result means no punch records for the period) to close the workflow's validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean (short tables, terse commands) but the employee_type/user_ids auto-fill rule is stated three times — the parameter table, the 填充示例 section, and the closing '注意' note ("user_ids 数组保持为空[]，employee_type 保持 employee_no 不变") — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. Not a 4 because the triple repetition is avoidable padding, not a minor trim. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete CLI templates ('lark-cli schema attendance.<resource>.<method>', 'lark-cli attendance <resource> <method> [flags]') and a params JSON skeleton are given, but there is no worked example of a complete call — the resource/method slots stay as placeholders and the actual --data/--params shape is deferred entirely to the schema command. This sits between 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' and 'mostly executable', closer to 3. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear: read ../lark-shared/SKILL.md first, run schema before any API call, then execute — and the schema-first rule acts as a checkpoint. It is not 5 because there are no validation steps for the response (e.g. handling empty records or errors) beyond delegating auth/permission handling to the shared skill. The destructive-operation cap does not apply since user_tasks.query is read-only. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, well organized into short labeled sections, and its only reference is a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep link to ../lark-shared/SKILL.md (bolded CRITICAL instruction); no bundle files exist to inline, so nothing is misplaced. This matches the anchor-5 pattern and the rubric's simple-skill guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |