Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary minimal redirect: token-efficient, unambiguous, and clearly signaled. The only substantive risks are that it fully delegates without any fallback if the target skill is missing, and that the referenced sibling path was not verifiable in the available bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is three lean lines — a title, one sentence stating purpose ('本技能只用于兼容旧名称，不直接处理业务'), and one mandatory directive. Every token earns its place with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives one unambiguous, concrete instruction with an exact path ('MUST 完整读取 ../lark-meeting/SKILL.md，并按照其中的路由和行动指南执行'). It falls short of 5 because all working instructions are outsourced to the target skill and there is no fallback guidance if the referenced file is absent. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill whose single action (read the successor skill fully and follow it) is unambiguous; the simple-skill exception applies and no destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation checkpoints are required. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference is clearly signaled, bolded, and exactly one level deep. It does not reach 5 because the referenced path ../lark-meeting/SKILL.md could not be verified to exist alongside this skill in the bundle structure, leaving a possible dangling reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |