Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with strong progressive disclosure and executable examples. The main gap is missing explicit validation/verification checkpoints for batch and destructive operations, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/verification steps after batch-create and indicator-update (e.g. confirm the returned OKR IDs and re-fetch cycle-detail before declaring success) to establish a validate-then-proceed loop.
Collapse the overlap between the 快速决策 decision table and the Shortcuts table, or cross-reference one from the other, to reduce redundancy and tighten token use.
Make the multi-step 'view OKR' and 'write OKR' flows into numbered sequences with checkpoints rather than only implying them via the decision table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — a decision table, shortcut list, and executable command examples assume Claude's competence; minor repetition between the 快速决策 table and Shortcuts table could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready lark-cli commands with concrete flags and JSON payloads (cycle-list, cycle-detail, batch-create, indicator-update, search-user) cover the common cases with executable specifics. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 快速决策 table gives decision paths but the multi-step OKR workflows (e.g. view→create→update) lack explicit validation checkpoints; for batch-create and indicator-update there is no validate/verify-then-proceed feedback loop, which caps the score at 3 per the destructive/batch guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview SKILL.md with well-signaled one-level-deep references to real files in references/ (entities, contentblock, per-verb docs); navigation is easy and content is appropriately split across 25 reference files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |