Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with excellent progressive disclosure (all references verified real and one level deep) and copy-paste-ready commands. Its main weaknesses are the absence of validation/confirmation checkpoints before destructive and batch operations, which caps workflow clarity at 3, and some repetition of the score-vs-progress guidance.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation or confirmation checkpoints before destructive and batch operations (e.g., verify the progress/comment ID via +progress-get or +comment-get and confirm with the user before +progress-delete / +comment-delete, and dry-run review of the batch JSON before +batch-create).
Add error-recovery feedback loops for the batch/reorder/weight workflows, e.g., 'if the request fails param validation because not all KR IDs/weights were included, fetch the full list with objective.key_results list, then retry with all IDs/weights summing to 1'.
Consolidate the score-vs-progress guidance (currently in the routing table, and again in two separate paragraphs) into a single rule block to tighten the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but there is minor redundancy: the score-vs-progress distinction is stated three times (lines 25, 61, 63) and the entities reference is recommended twice (lines 102, 105). This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the lean-every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with realistic flags and JSON payloads (e.g., the +batch-create example with a full --input JSON string, +indicator-update with --level/--id/--value), plus a lookup command for users and a routing table mapping each user need to a specific command and reference doc — covering the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step sequences are present and well-ordered (获取用户 ID -> +cycle-list -> +cycle-detail -> 按需查指标/进展记录), and some param-validation pitfalls are documented (reorder/weight must include all IDs; alignment cycles must overlap). However, destructive and batch operations (+progress-delete marked 不可恢复, permanent comment deletes, +batch-create, +reorder, +weight) have no validation or confirmation checkpoints, so per the rubric cap workflow clarity cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that routes to 26 one-level-deep reference files, every referenced path in the body resolves to a real file in references/, navigation is via clearly labeled routing and shortcuts tables, and bulk detail (entities, contentblock format, per-command guides) is correctly deferred to those files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |