Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, executable operations manual with strong workflow sequencing, validation checkpoints, and a clean one-level reference structure verified against the bundle. Its only weakness is moderate repetition of safety warnings across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the high-risk approval protocol into a single location and cross-reference it, instead of restating the --dry-run/--yes flow in multiple sections.
Merge the AI-formula rules so they appear once (either guideline #3 or the callout box) rather than restating conditions, sentinels, and the 'failed==0 even with pending' criterion twice.
Tighten the '公共四件套' section — the XOR explanation and exception list could be shortened without losing the定位 resource guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and actionable with no padding of basic concepts, but several warnings are repeated across sections (high-risk approval protocol referenced multiple places; AI-formula rules restated in both guideline #3 and the callout box) that could be tightened — matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. Not a 3 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows; not a 5 because the repetition is more than trivial. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout — concrete shortcuts ('+csv-get', '+dim-insert --inherit-style before|after', '+formula-verify --exit-on-error') plus a copy-paste bash example 'lark-cli sheets +csv-get --url … --sheet-name … --range A1:F30' covering common cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Explicit pipeline ('了解结构→读数据→原生工具写入→回读验证→在线交付'), a 9-rule checklist, sentinel-based validation, feedback loops ('试错 3 次仍失败可降级静态值'), and a high-risk approval gate with --dry-run/--yes; validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview (scenario→command table, editing criteria, flag reference) with well-signaled one-level-deep references organized into two groups; all 20 referenced files exist in ./references/, matching the clear-overview top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |