Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable routing and pitfall guide with an explicit validated workflow and clean one-level progressive disclosure into verified reference files. Its only weakness is verbosity from repeated reinforcement of a few critical rules.
Suggestions
Consolidate the formula-verify 收尾 rule into one authoritative location and cross-reference it, instead of restating it in 准则4, the ⚠️ block, 执行要点, and the write-cells/formula-verify reference descriptions.
Tighten the longest 场景→命令速查 table cells (e.g., the +table-put and +workbook-import rows) by moving extended rationale into the linked references, keeping the table to intent → command → reference.
Consider a short top-of-file 'quick reference' summary of the 9 编辑准则 so the expanded rationale can be trimmed without losing the checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Almost every token is domain-specific knowledge Claude lacks (real shortcut/flag names, pitfalls), but it is verbose: the formula-verify 收尾 rule is reinforced 4–5 times across sections and several 场景表 cells are extremely long, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands ('+csv-get --range', '+table-put --sheets', '+cells-set --range') with flags and a copy-paste bash 调用范式, fully actionable rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | States an explicit end-to-end sequence ('了解结构 → 读数据 → 理解语义 → 原生工具优先 → 写入 → 回读验证') with validation checkpoints (回读校验, formula-verify until status='success', assert 条数) and checklists for batch/destructive operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with two organized, one-level-deep reference groups (通用方法与规范 + 按对象的工具参考), each entry described; all 19 referenced files verified present, so navigation is easy and well-signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |