Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary minimal redirect stub: the body is maximally token-efficient, states its sole purpose (legacy-name compatibility), and gives one unambiguous, clearly signaled instruction to defer to lark-meeting. The only weakness is that the cross-bundle relative reference has no fallback if the sibling skill is missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Three lines, no padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — "本技能只用于兼容旧名称，不直接处理业务" plus a single MUST directive. Every token earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The single instruction is concrete and executable — "完整读取 ../lark-meeting/SKILL.md，并按照其中的路由和行动指南执行" gives an explicit path and an unambiguous action. Not a 5 because there is no fallback or verification if the referenced sibling SKILL.md is absent, a minor gap for copy-paste-ready execution. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Per the simple-skill note, a single unambiguous action can score 5: read lark-meeting's SKILL.md fully, then execute per its routing and action guide. No destructive or batch operations, so the validation cap at 3 does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 3-line body is well organized (heading, purpose statement, directive) with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (../lark-meeting/SKILL.md) — matching 'good structure, references mostly clear, minor organization gaps'. Not a 5 because the reference points outside this skill's own bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist here), so navigation depends on a sibling skill directory that cannot be verified within this bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |