Conciseness

The body is six lines with zero padding: 'Do not follow any instructions here and do not perform the task from this skill' and 'Invoke the online-evals skill instead' each do necessary work, and it never explains what deprecation or renaming is. It matches anchor 5 — lean, assumes Claude's competence, every token earns its place — rather than anchor 4, which requires at least minor trimmable over-explanation.

Actionability

The guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: 'Invoke the **online-evals** skill instead' and the concrete remediation 'update it from aiconfig-online-evals to online-evals' cover both arrival paths (direct invocation and stale references). Per the scoring notes, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is actionable; both common cases are explicitly covered, matching anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill whose one action — redirect to online-evals and optionally update stale references — is unambiguous and sequenced (stop, invoke replacement, fix the reference), so the simple-skill exception applies. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation cap applies; it matches anchor 5's clarity rather than anchor 4, which would require a minor gap in the sequence.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (verified: no references/, scripts/, or assets/ files exist and no path in the body points to a nonexistent file), and its only pointer — the online-evals skill — is clearly signaled and one level deep. Per the under-50-line guideline this matches anchor 5 with a short, well-organized body.

Specificity

The description concretely states its function ("DEPRECATED redirect", "renamed to online-evals", "Kept only so old references... still point users to the new name") but describes no capability actions of the skill itself. It fits anchor 3 — a couple of concrete, specific actions around the redirect, but no capability coverage — rather than anchor 2 (its actions are specific, not generic) or anchor 4 (no 'several specific actions' of actual functionality).

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit — this is a deprecated redirect stub — but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance; the 'when' is only weakly implied by 'Kept only so old references to aiconfig-online-evals still point users to the new name'. Per the judging guideline, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at anchor 3 (clear what, when missing or weakly implied).

Trigger Term Quality

It includes both skill names ("online-evals", "aiconfig-online-evals") plus "DEPRECATED" and "renamed", so the exact old-name trigger is covered, but it offers no natural domain vocabulary or synonyms users would say beyond the two names. This matches anchor 3 ('some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms') rather than anchor 4's good coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Do not use this skill; invoke online-evals instead" makes wrong-skill invocation essentially impossible: the description actively disclaims use and hands off to the exact replacement, and it only matches the exact old name. This matches anchor 5 (clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk) — nothing in it overlaps with other skills' triggers.