Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
As a deprecation-redirect stub, the body is exemplary: maximally concise, fully actionable with exact old/new names, an unambiguous single-step workflow, and clean structure with no unnecessary bundle files. The rubric penalizes neither its brevity nor its lack of code — what is written is exactly what should be written.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is four lean lines under a clear header — "This skill has been renamed", "Invoke the projects skill instead", "update it from aiconfig-projects to projects" — with zero padding and nothing Claude doesn't need to be told; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable: an unambiguous instruction ("Invoke the projects skill instead") plus a concrete migration step ("update it from `aiconfig-projects` to `projects`") with exact names — nothing is left abstract. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill (a redirect) under 50 lines, and the single action is completely unambiguous: do not follow anything here, invoke projects instead, update stale references — the simple-skill exception applies and no validation is needed for a non-destructive redirect. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed; the under-50-line rule applies — the header plus three well-delimited paragraphs are clean, navigable structure with no inlined content that belongs elsewhere. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |