Conciseness

The body is a lean ~6-line redirect with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place.

Actionability

It gives concrete, executable direction ('Invoke the configs-targeting skill instead') plus an actionable maintenance instruction ('update it from aiconfig-targeting to configs-targeting'), but there are no literal commands or code, so it stops just short of copy-paste-ready.

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose skill, the single action (invoke configs-targeting) is unambiguous and correctly prioritized, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the body is well-organized with a clear heading and a single one-level-deep pointer to configs-targeting; the simple-skill exception applies.

Specificity

The description names concrete actions for a redirect — 'invoke configs-targeting instead' and 'update it from aiconfig-targeting to configs-targeting' — but coverage is limited to the redirect's two actions rather than a comprehensive capability list, matching the anchor that names domain and 1-2 concrete actions.

Completeness

It answers both what ('renamed to configs-targeting... invoke configs-targeting instead') and when ('Kept only so old references to aiconfig-targeting still point users to the new name'), with the when clause explicit though it is a redirect rather than a capability description.

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces the natural trigger term 'aiconfig-targeting' that an old reference would cite, plus 'configs-targeting', but lacks common variations or synonyms beyond the two skill names, fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The redirect is highly specific to one named deprecated skill and an explicit replacement, so it occupies a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though by design it overlaps conceptually with the replacement skill it points to.