Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a safe update-archive-delete workflow and explicit verification steps. Weakest spots are the duplicated archive guidance, missing example payloads for the update tools, and a vague rollback path when verification fails.
Suggestions
Consolidate the archiving guidance: it currently appears in Core Principles, the 'Archive a config' block, and What NOT to Do — state it once fully and reference it elsewhere to trim tokens (conciseness).
Add one concrete example payload per tool (e.g., an update-ai-config-variation body showing modelConfigKey, modelName, and a parameters object) so updates are copy-paste ready (actionability).
Replace 'rollback if needed' with an explicit verification-failure loop: if get-ai-config does not reflect the change, re-apply with corrected parameters rather than retrying blindly (workflow_clarity).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — tight principles like 'Fetch Before Changing' and tool-specific parameters earn their tokens — but the intro sentence restates the description, and archiving guidance is repeated across Core Principles, Step 2, and What NOT to Do. Fits anchor 4 (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than 5, since consolidation would save meaningful tokens. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact MCP tools and concrete parameters ('archived: true', 'confirm: true', 'modelConfigKey', 'modelName', 'temperature, max_tokens') — highly actionable for an instruction-only skill — but provides no example request payloads for the update calls. Anchor 4 (mostly executable, concrete commands with minor gaps) fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step sequence (assess health → make update → verify with get-ai-config) with explicit verification checkpoints and confirm-gating on irreversible deletes, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. Not 5: failure recovery is vague ('rollback if needed') with no explicit fix-and-retry loop when verification shows unexpected values. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill: clear sections (Prerequisites, Core Principles, Workflow, What NOT to Do, More resources, Related Skills), one well-signaled external docs reference, and no inline content that belongs in a separate file. No bundle files exist, and nothing is buried or nested — navigation is easy, fitting the anchor-5 structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |