Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable examples and a well-sequenced, validated workflow; its only weakness is minor verbosity and a monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting some reference material out.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph and "Core Principles" where they restate steps already detailed in the Workflow.
Consider moving the exhaustive optional-field reference (holdoutId, dataSource, analysisConfig, etc.) into a separate reference file linked from the main workflow.
Optionally add a compact "happy path" summary at the top to let Claude proceed without reading every step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic concept explanations, though the opening paragraph and "Core Principles" section partly restate workflow steps and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable JSON payloads and concrete tool/field names for create, start, evolve, and stop, covering the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 5 verify, winner-required stop) and error-recovery guidance (skipped-field handling, no-stop-without-winner path). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections and appropriately self-contained with no nested references, though a ~230-line guide with large JSON examples could split exhaustive field reference into a separate file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |