Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted advisory workflow: concrete tool calls, typed guidance, an explicit validation checkpoint (event health), and a strong output template. Its only weaknesses are slight redundancy between the Step 2 and Step 5 examples and edge-case detail that could be offloaded to a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence, teaching only product-specific facts (CUPED incompatibility, mid-experiment restart, context-kind matching) rather than general concepts. Minor redundancy exists — the Step 5 output example repeats the auto-attach formatting demonstrated in Step 2 — so it falls just short of 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable for an instruction-only skill: concrete MCP calls (list-release-policies(projectKey), list-metrics, list-metric-events), exact upfront questions, a typed secondary-metric table, specific numeric guidance (2-3 metrics max), and a copy-ready output template covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with explicit per-path branching, gating directives ('For experiments — skip this step', 'Show this inventory before recommending'), an event-health validation checkpoint, and escalation triggers ('Raise this immediately if the user mentions they're mid-experiment'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned body with clear headers and one-level-deep links to related skills. However, at ~175 lines with detailed edge-case content ('Important Context') that could live in a reference file, it shows minor organization gaps rather than an appropriately split structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |