Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable workflow that adds only non-obvious domain knowledge, with explicit validation checkpoints and well-signaled references to sibling skills. It earns full marks across all four content dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; it conveys LaunchDarkly-specific knowledge Claude does not already have (auto-attach from release policies, CUPED/percentile incompatibility, context-kind matching) with no filler or elementary concept explanation. Every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP calls ("list-release-policies(projectKey)"), typed secondary-metric tables, and specific numeric guidance ("2–3 metrics maximum", "More than five creates false positive rollback risk"). Recommendations are copy-ready and decision-oriented. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: cross-referencing list-metrics with list-metric-events for event health, warning on at-risk metrics, and flagging context-kind mismatches, CUPED/percentile conflicts, and mid-experiment restarts. Error-recovery guidance is concrete ("Instrument the event before including it, or remove it"). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with no bundle directories; the body is well-organized into prerequisites, workflow, important context, and related skills. The only references are one-level-deep pointers to sibling skills (metric-create, metric-instrument), clearly signaled and easy to navigate. Per the simple-skill scoring note, this warrants a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |