Attach judges to config variations for automatic LLM-as-a-judge evaluation. Create custom judges, configure sampling rates, and monitor quality scores.
55
61%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
High
Do not use without reviewing
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/agentcontrol/online-evals/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 high severity finding. You should review these findings carefully before considering using this skill.
The skill handles credentials insecurely by requiring the agent to include secret values verbatim in its generated output. This exposes credentials in the agent’s context and conversation history, creating a risk of data exfiltration.
The skill instructs checking for or prompting for API tokens and shows curl/Python examples that embed an Authorization token placeholder into headers/commands, which encourages the LLM or user to supply and place secret values verbatim into outputs/requests.
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
SKILL.md’s runtime workflow uses `model.run(user_input)` (and `judge.evaluate(input_text, output_text)`) where `user_input`/input/output are supplied by the caller, so outsider-authored free text is directly ingested by the LLM for evaluation via attached judges.
82ce1ba
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.