Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and workflow-structured with explicit checkpoints and concrete specifics, while keeping explanation lean. Structure and references are well signaled, though some env-var content is repeated across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the env-var convention so it is stated once (in 'Plan the changes') and merely referenced from 'Present the plan' to remove repetition.
Verify the referenced ../../references/sdk/recipes.md and snippets/ paths resolve in the parent skill bundle, since this skill ships no bundle files of its own.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich, assuming Claude's competence (no explanations of what an SDK or feature flag is), but the env-var convention is restated across 'Plan the changes' and 'Present the plan' and dual-SDK details repeat, so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete project-type-to-SDK/key table, exact env var names (LAUNCHDARKLY_SDK_KEY, NEXT_PUBLIC_...), named files, and numbered steps; intentionally delegates literal install commands to the recipes.md reference rather than vague hand-waving. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear multi-step sequence (Choose SDK -> Dual-SDK -> Plan changes -> Present plan) with an explicit D6 non-blocking checkpoint and references to downstream validation gates (D7 secret consent, D8 non-LD dependency approval). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References external materials one level deep with well-signaled links (recipes.md, snippets/, sibling detect/apply skills), but the skill has no bundle files in its own references/scripts/assets directories; the referenced sdk materials live in the parent bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |