Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and actionable with concrete code examples and clear sequencing for both stories and docs. Its main weaknesses are the absence of a validation/verification checkpoint in the workflow and references that are not clearly signaled or split into dedicated files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'Run the story in Storybook and confirm each story renders without console errors before finalizing.'
Convert bare path references (documentation/contributing/WritingStories.mdx, packages/components/src/*) into clearly signaled links or move reusable story/doc templates into a bundled reference file.
Consider extracting the full MDX section template and story meta boilerplate into a references/ template file so the SKILL.md body stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet lists and short, focused code blocks assume Claude's competence without explaining what Storybook or MDX is; only minor redundancy with the description keeps it from being pristine. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, executable TSX meta and MDX usage code blocks plus specific naming conventions and section order, making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are explicitly sequenced (Required Stories order, exact section order), but no validation or verification checkpoint (e.g. confirming the story renders) is given, which matches the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are reasonably organized, but references are bare backtick repo paths rather than navigable links, no bundle files exist to verify, and inline template content could be split into a separate reference file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |