Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestration skill with real reference files, explicit validation, and error-recovery paths. The main cost is token efficiency: duplicated step numbering, triple-stated confirmation rules, and inline contract detail push the body well past what its own reference files could absorb.
Suggestions
Fix the duplicated step numbering: merge "Step 0: Load Config" and "Step 0: Load Context" into a single Step 0 so the phase sequence reads unambiguously.
State the explicit-confirmation rule (criteria, max iterations, time budget) once as a guardrail and reference it from the quick-mode and full-setup lists instead of repeating it three times.
Compress the skill-context section to its core rule (skill-context overrides win; verify all outputs against them) and move the run.json/current.json schemas into a reference file, keeping only field-role summaries inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and project-specific (no concepts Claude already knows), but contains real redundancy: two sections are both numbered "Step 0" ("Load Config" and "Load Context"), the explicit-confirmation rule is stated three times (quick-mode steps 5-8, the "Critical guardrail", and "Never treat criteria... as final"), and the skill-context section restates its override rule four different ways. It could be tightened without losing anything. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready JSON templates for run.json and current.json, an exact history.jsonl example line, concrete run_id/alias formats, a mkdir command, a stop-reason-to-status mapping table, an exact iteration-summary output template, and invocation examples fully specify execution; deferring phase I/O details to the real PHASE-CONTRACTS.md is a well-signaled split, not a gap. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-9 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (EVALUATE scoring, retry-once with phase_error, corrupted-run.json reconstruction from history.jsonl), feedback loops (CRITIQUE->REFINE, stagnation tracking), and a precedence-ordered stop-condition contract with rationale. The duplicate "Step 0" numbering is a blemish but does not break the sequence. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Six reference files (ACTIVE-TIME-BUDGET, CONTEXT-MANAGEMENT, CRITERIA-TEMPLATES, PHASE-CONTRACTS, RULE-SCHEMA, TERMINAL-REPORT) all exist, are exactly one level deep, and are clearly signaled in bold at their point of use with an inline summary plus pointer. However, the ~500-line body still inlines full schemas and contract prose (run.json schema, stop-condition precedence, terminal-report rules) that could partly live in the existing reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |