Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable procedural skill with an explicitly sequenced workflow and thorough edge-case handling. Its main weakness is token efficiency: roughly a quarter of the body is question-UI and precedence policy only loosely exercised by a read-only warmup.
Suggestions
Trim the "Runtime-aware questions" section to the one case that can occur (project root cannot be identified), or move the full question-tool contract to a shared reference, since the skill otherwise forbids asking setup questions.
Quantify the handoff size (e.g., a line or token budget for the Step 3 summary) so "concise" and "compact" are executable rather than judgment calls.
Merge the "Shared project skill-context" precedence rules into Step 0 or a short reference, removing the duplicated statements about not relaxing project boundaries.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Steps 0-3 are tight and information-dense, but the ~20-line "Runtime-aware questions" section elaborates question-asking policy for an edge case the skill itself mostly forbids ("Do not ask setup questions unless the project root itself cannot be identified"), and "Shared project skill-context" restates precedence rules — content that could be tightened. Not 2, since there is no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact config keys with documented defaults ("paths.description (default .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md)"), ordered read sequences, named handoff sections, and explicit skip/stop rules. Not 5 because a few judgment calls (e.g., how "compact" the handoff should be) remain open. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-3 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints for error recovery at each stage: "Missing artifacts are normal. Record them as missing and continue", "an existing unreadable file stops dependent work with its path", "If config cannot be parsed confidently, report that and use defaults", and "Report and ignore invalid entries" for warmup.paths. The skill is read-only, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all guidance appropriately lives in SKILL.md with well-organized, clearly headed sections and no nested references; the file paths mentioned in the body are the skill's runtime subject, not bundle references. Not 5 because the skill exceeds 50 lines and two policy sections (runtime-aware questions, shared skill-context) read as inlineable material that could be split out or slimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |