Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and highly actionable, with executable commands, argument tables, and response examples throughout. It is concise and well-organized with only minor redundancy and no destructive-operation validation concerns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean with executable commands and argument tables, though the --computer routing behavior is restated a few times, leaving minor instances that could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands, an argument table, and concrete JSON response examples covering the common cases, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The find-agent -> start/continue conversation -> read-response sequence is clear with implicit checkpoints (e.g. "Results include agent_id"), but lacks explicit validate-then-proceed feedback loops, fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with a single clearly signaled one-level reference (the finding-agents skill) and no nesting, though no dedicated reference files are used, fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |