Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction skill with a concrete command, a well-sequenced workflow, and a built-in success/failure checkpoint. Adding a short worked example report and a failure retry path would push actionability and workflow clarity to the top anchor.
Suggestions
Include one short, fully filled-in example feedback report so the expected output format is unambiguous (boosts actionability).
Expand the submission failure step into a light retry/escalation loop (e.g., retry once on transient CLI error, then surface the error) to reach the top workflow-clarity anchor.
Trim the list of "do not submit" filler examples to one or two to tighten conciseness further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and focused with no concept-padding Claude already knows, but a few prescriptive negative-example lists ("the feature is broken", "the UX should be improved") could be trimmed slightly, fitting anchor 4 over 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste command (letta feedback --message '<feedback>') and a concrete report spec with a required disclosure line; the minor gap is the absence of a fully worked example report. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with an explicit success/failure checkpoint (report the safe CLI error, do not claim the team received it), but the failure path is not a retry loop, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references, qualifying for the top score under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |