Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, expert-level playbook with excellent actionability and token efficiency: exact paths, templates, commit formats, and explicit DO/DO NOT decision rules. The main gap is the absence of a verification step after destructive merges, and no defined source for the <TICKET> placeholder used in every commit message.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint after each merge — e.g., re-parse or syntax-check the shrunk .testcase file before committing, and only commit when it passes — to satisfy the destructive/batch feedback-loop requirement.
Define where <TICKET> comes from (a required input, git branch name, or a prompt to the user) since it appears in every commit message format but is never resolved.
Consider moving the merge-signal catalogs (DO/DO NOT lists and common patterns) to a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as the workflow overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence throughout — no explanation of what Poshi or Liferay is, no library background; every line is an instruction, a decision rule, or a concrete template. Nothing reads as padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance: exact scan paths (portal-web/test/functional/com/liferay/portalweb/tests/enduser), a copy-ready plan template, exact commit message formats ("<TICKET> Rename test <Keeper> to <FinalName>"), and real assertion examples (AssertTextEquals.assertPartialText("web/<site-path>") vs AssertVisible value1="http://"). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is coherent with pre-operation checkpoints (clean-tree precondition, enumeration abort, plan-mode approval gate), but this is a destructive batch workflow — deleting test blocks and committing per operation — with no post-operation validation (e.g., syntax-check or run the shrunk .testcase file before/after committing), which caps it at 3 per the destructive/batch rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~93-line body is well organized with clear headers (Preconditions, Input, Expected Output with plan template and DO/DO NOT signals, Summary). At this length the merge-signal catalogs and plan template would sit equally well in a one-level reference file, which keeps it just below the top anchor's structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |