Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, action-dense playbook with explicit sequencing, validation gates (clean tree, component enumeration, plan approval), and copy-ready commit templates. It assumes Claude's intelligence and stays concise. No bundle files are referenced, so progressive disclosure scores via clean section organization.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it states outcomes, preconditions, and rules without padding or re-explaining what Poshi/Liferay tests are. Each token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — exact commit message templates ("<TICKET> Rename test <Keeper> to <FinalName>"), the plan-mode format, merge rules, and where to scan files — leaving little ambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced with checkpoints: clean-tree precondition, component verification/abort, plan-mode approval gate, per-operation commits, and a final summary — feedback and validation loops are explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a self-contained single-purpose skill with no bundle files, the body is well organized into Preconditions, Input, Expected Output, and Summary sections, so the simple-skill allowance applies. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |