Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured dispatcher with concrete commands and excellent one-level-deep progressive disclosure into the mode files and templates. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the end-to-end flow lacks an explicit validation/verification checkpoint before delivery, particularly for the multi-card batch mode.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint before 交付, e.g. '渲染后确认 PNG 尺寸/张数符合模具要求，再报告路径', so the flow has a validate→fix→retry feedback loop.
For the '-m' multi-card (batch) path, state how to verify all cards were generated and cut correctly before reporting delivery.
Number the core steps (获取内容 → 命名 → 选模具/Read mode → 渲染 → 截图 → 验证 → 交付) so the sequence and its checkpoint are explicit rather than implied by section order.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — '内容进去，PNG 出来。模具决定形状。' plus compact tables and terse rules; it does not explain concepts Claude already knows and every section earns its place, matching the score-3 'lean and efficient' anchor rather than the score-2 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: a copy-paste capture command ('node assets/capture.js <html> <png> <width> <height> [fullpage]'), an error-recovery command, a concrete footer HTML snippet, and an execution table mapping each mode to exact mode-file and template paths; matches the score-3 'fully executable code/commands; specific examples' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is present via ordered sections (获取内容→文件命名→截图→Footer→交付) and the execution table, with one reactive error-recovery loop for capture, but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint before delivery (e.g., confirm the rendered PNG is correct) and the multi-card '-m' batch path has no verification; this fits the score-2 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than the score-3 'explicit validation steps'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview that points to one-level-deep references with explicit navigation ('先 Read references/taste.md' and a table mapping each parameter to its references/mode-*.md and assets/*_template.html); all referenced bundle files exist on disk, matching the score-3 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |