Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, actionable methodology with strong validation feedback loops, but it is verbose in places and ships most of its material inline rather than splitting bulky sections into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim the philosophical '约束是什么' section and de-duplicate the '急着找出口，就会看不清墙' and '描述不是改造' refrains to tighten conciseness.
Move the three ASCII diagram templates (and optionally the 中文母语化 style guide) into a references file (e.g. references/diagrams.md) and link to it, improving progressive disclosure.
Keep the 7-step 工序 and 心内判据 checklist as-is — these are the strongest, most executable parts of the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient methodology content, but padded with philosophical exposition (the water/cup and light-speed analogies in '约束是什么') and repeated reinforcement ('急着找出口，就会看不清墙' and '描述不是改造' each appear multiple times) that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete 7-step 工序 with specific probe questions, a 4-step 落地 sequence, three ASCII diagram templates, and literal output commands with a referenced frontmatter template — actionable for an instruction-only skill, with only minor abstraction in the analytical steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step process is paired with a 7-item 心内判据 validation checklist and an explicit feedback loop ('过不了一条，回工序接着走'), giving sequenced steps with checkpoints and error-recovery guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers provide structure and the one bundle file (references/template.org) is clearly signaled, but the ~244-line monolithic body inlines bulky material — three diagram templates and the style guide — that could be split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |