Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Concise, actionable, and well-structured with concrete commands and a copy-paste template; the main gap is the absence of any validation/verification checkpoint in the write-out workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step after writing the org-mode file, e.g. confirm the file exists at the reported path and that required top-level headings (* 定锚, * 八刀, etc.) are present.
Include a minimal completed example (a short解剖 of a simple concept like '熵') so the expected output shape is unambiguous beyond the empty template.
Clarify the failure path if date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S or the ~/Documents/notes directory is unavailable, to close the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout—each dimension is 2-3 lines, no padding, no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place ('只留筋骨，不带水分'). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: a shell command (date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S), an exact output path, a copy-paste org-mode template, and a precise ASCII charset constraint for diagrams. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five phases (定锚→八刀→内观→压缩→写入) are clearly sequenced, but there are no validation or feedback checkpoints (e.g., verifying the org file was written or is well-formed), matching the 'steps listed but checkpoints missing' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained skill with well-organized sections and no external bundle files; nothing needs to be split off, so the inline structure is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |