Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model instruction-only skill: dense, concrete, and immediately actionable, with a clearly sequenced workflow that includes an explicit red-line validation pass and acceptance criteria. The only structural note is that everything lives inline in a ~100-line file, which is appropriate here but sits just past the simple-skill threshold for progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is exceptionally lean: every rule carries a concrete test or before→after example (「进行分析」→「看」, "大概 70%" 比"可能"诚实), with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — a clean match for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands (date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S), a concrete filename pattern {时间戳}--plain-{简短标题}__plain.org, a literal Org header template, an output directory, and multiple concrete rewrite examples; the open-ended writing step is explicitly justified ("不规定怎么写。规定不能怎么写"), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (获取内容 → 写 → 过红线 → 生成 Org 文件) with an explicit validation pass — the red-line scan produces a 修改清单 (哪句触发什么，改前→改后) — plus a 验收 acceptance checklist, matching anchor 5. This is an instruction-only, non-destructive skill, so the validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content is appropriately inline for a cohesive single-file style guide, with well-organized sections and clear headers. Anchor 4 fits better than 5 because the ~100-line body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold where section organization alone earns a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |