Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary craft skill body: lean, concrete, and tightly structured with explicit validation gates and acceptance criteria. It adds only what Claude would not already know and every directive is actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse, punchy prose that assumes Claude's competence ("让人 grok。不规定怎么写。规定不能怎么写。下限锁死，上限放开。") with no padded explanation of what rewriting is; every section earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Instruction-only skill with fully concrete guidance: exact allowed ASCII charset, exact commands (`date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S`), exact filename pattern, a complete org file-header template, and concrete before→after transforms ("「进行分析」→「看」", "「有人觉得情况不太好」→「张三说项目要黄了」"). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four-step 执行 sequence (获取内容 → 写 → 过红线 → 生成 Org 文件) with an explicit red-line gate and 修改清单 before file generation, plus a 验收 acceptance checklist; not capped at 2 since the operation is non-destructive. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single ~105-line body is cleanly sectioned (格式约束 / 红线 / 工具箱 / 执行 / 验收) with no monolithic dump to externalize and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |