Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body with explicit validation loops and complete templates. Its main weakness is monolithic inline reference material that should be split into clearly signaled one-level-deep files.
Suggestions
Move the 9-frame ASCII catalogue and the English化 remediation table into separate reference files (e.g. references/ascii-frames.md, references/chinese-style.md) and link them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim the repeated Deutsch /《无穷的开始》framing to a single statement of the two criteria to reduce token overhead.
Add an explicit markdown link to references/template.org from the output section so the one bundle file is clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and full of genuinely non-obvious methodology, but ~480 lines with some repeated Deutsch framing and padding that could be trimmed; not yet fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete operating questions, a 7-step procedure, one-line tests for each of 5 criteria, nine fully-drawn ASCII frame templates, and an executable output script with exact date commands and file path. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (反生成复现, 预测+变更双测) and an error-recovery loop ('过不了一条,推倒重来—回到工序第 3 步'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Has clear section headers and is navigable, but the 480-line body inlines large reference catalogues (the 9 ASCII frame families, the English化 table, the criteria) that belong in separate files, and the sole bundle file is not linked via markdown navigation. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |