Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a genuinely actionable methodology — sequenced process, explicit validation gates, feedback loops, and rich ASCII exemplars — but it is monolithic and repetitive: the same Deutsch criterion is explained three times, and the large diagram catalog that belongs in a reference file is fully inlined while the existing template.org reference is never pointed to.
Suggestions
Move the nine-family ASCII diagram catalog (with its exemplars and 演示要求) into a reference file such as references/diagrams.md, keeping only the shape-selection table and a one-line pointer in SKILL.md.
Deduplicate the Deutsch hard-to-vary explanation: state the reach / hard-to-vary gates once in the criteria section and have step 7 and the intro reference them briefly instead of restating them in full.
Reference references/template.org explicitly in the 输出 section (e.g. "use the header from [template.org](references/template.org)") so the existing bundle file is discoverable and the org header format is not duplicated or lost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose with padded sections: the Deutsch hard-to-vary criterion is fully restated three times (intro "坏解释能用十种说法糊过去", step 7 "你能改的,都不是它的内核", criteria section "坏解释怎么改都还能用;好解释一动就塌"), and the Christianity/physics/economics assumption examples plus two separate "懒惰锚点" riffs re-explain concepts at unnecessary length. It sits below anchor 3 because the redundancy is repeated full restatements rather than occasional tightening. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable: a named 7-step procedure, five explicit criteria, decision rules for when to use each diagram family, nine copy-ready ASCII exemplars, and concrete output commands ("date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S", file path pattern). Minor gap: the org-file header format lives in references/template.org but is never linked from the output section. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear end-to-end sequence (基本假设 → 工序 1-7 → 五条判据 → 形状/坐标系两层判断 → 写法 → 图示 → 输出) with explicit validation checkpoints (反生成, 预测+变更双测, two 反坍缩闸 self-checklists) and an explicit error-recovery feedback loop: "过不了一条,推倒重来——回到工序第 3 步". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~200-line nine-family ASCII catalog is inlined in SKILL.md where it clearly belongs in a separate reference file, and the one bundle file that exists (references/template.org) is never referenced from the body — a buried, unsignaled reference while separable content stays inline. It falls below anchor 3 because the reference is not merely unclearly signaled but entirely unlinked. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |