Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-sequenced dialogue skill with concrete templates and strong actionability. The main gap is a missing verification step on the final org-file write.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after writing the org file (e.g., confirm the path exists and report it back) to close the workflow-clarity validation gap.
Consider extracting the per-layer guided-question bank into a reference file so the main flow stays leaner, given the body exceeds 200 lines.
Tighten the per-layer probe sections by merging the 'diagnostic signal' notes more compactly to reduce a few minor verbose passages.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and free of basic-concept padding; the length is justified by a genuinely multi-layer process, with only minor passages that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: verbatim guided questions, explicit diagnostic signals, copy-paste ASCII diagram templates, and an exact file path plus timestamp command for the org write step. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Step 0–6 sequence is clearly ordered with decision branches and feedback loops (user reactions as data, resistance marking), but the file-write step lacks an explicit verification checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with clear section headers (Usage, Instructions, 对话流程, 判断路径速查) and well-placed inline diagrams; no external references are needed, and structure is good though the file is over 50 lines. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |