Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced methodology skill that gives concrete diagnostic language and three worked examples, with a routing table and feedback loops making the workflow unambiguous. Its only weakness is mild redundancy from restating the cycle across multiple sections.
Suggestions
Reduce redundancy between the ASCII cycle diagram, the Workflow Routing table, and the 体验循环 subsection headers — the diagram and table already encode the sequence, so the subsection intros can reference them rather than restate.
Consider moving the three Examples into a separate references file and signalling it from SKILL.md, which would let progressive_disclosure reach the top anchor while trimming the main body.
Tighten the 理想状态 bullet list, which partially restates outcomes already implied by the 体验循环 stages, to recover token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and skill-specific with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the six-stage cycle is restated across the diagram, the Workflow Routing table, and the 体验循环 subsections, leaving minor redundancy that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-ready guidance throughout — specific diagnostic questions ('你会怎么选？用一句话说理由', '你原来的判断里，哪条默认现在需要改？'), templated phrasings for the structure stage, and three worked examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced cycle (局面→选择→意外→结构→命名→迁移) is reinforced by a state-to-next-step Workflow Routing table, with explicit feedback loops (公平性校验, 迁移复测循环, 收束 criteria); not a destructive/batch operation so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (理想状态, 体验循环, 交互节奏, Gotchas, Examples) with easy navigation and no nested references; at ~130 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill safe harbor, and content stays entirely inline where a couple of sections could optionally be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |